Archive for the ‘bellow’ Category


John Hancocks

August 22, 2007

Via Books, Words, and Writing, a fun-to-browse collection of signatures.


For the Love of Reality

March 12, 2007

Rebecca Newberger Goldstein’s LA Times review of the third Library of America collection of Bellow’s novels is magnificent:

Bellow is often cited as a hero of narrative realism. But his relationship with reality was as complicated and adversarial as any writer’s before or after. A realist loves reality enough to be faithful to it, but Bellow, if he was a lover of reality at all, was a shifty and provisional one: He had no intention of being true, come what may. He was not going to submit himself. Let reality submit.

Though extolled as, first and foremost, a stylist — most especially by his English admirers, one of whom, James Wood, has edited “Novels 1956-1964” and its predecessor, “Novels 1944-1953” — his writing was no more about style than his fiction was about storytelling. Bellow wrote in order to take on reality. He loved reality the way Edmund Hillary loved Mt. Everest, or the biblical Jacob loved his nighttime wrestling opponent or Ahab loved the whale.

It’s extraordinary how many times Bellow calls out to his mighty antagonist by name: Reality. He uses the word more times than Kant and Hegel put together. That’s what he was up against, the thing he was out to master and possess, his metaphorically cleated boot planted smack on its exposed, bulging neck. The zealousness of his figurative language, the intermingling of milky thought and bloody-raw meat — these are never ends in themselves but a means of taking possession.


But the Write-Up is Not

February 4, 2007

In today’s Sunday Times, book review editor Sam Tanenhaus considers three Saul Bellow novels, Seize the Day, Henderson the Rain King, and Herzog, forwarding the opinion that Bellow is, in many ways, “beyond criticism.”

Interestingly, a number of the “defects” Tanenhaus points out in Bellow (“the longueurs and digressions, the lectures on anthroposophy and religion, the arcane reading lists”) are aspects of the novels I find most exciting. True, Bellow’s novels are the not tight, self-contained gems that we are accustomed to calling “perfect” — but they are very much the “baggy monsters” that Henry James called for (and wrote himself) and Mikhail Bakhtin praised. Of the three novels mentioned in the review, Seize the Day is the most self-contained, and shortest, while Herzog (whose protagonist Tanenhaus calls “the most fully realized intellectual in all of American fiction”) is the baggiest and best.

That being said, Tanenhaus does correctly praise the best parts of Bellow’s novels, speaking of “the almost physical sensation one has that each book is a fresh attempt to grab hold of knowable reality, in its many pulsating forms, and to fathom its latent messages.” Indeed.


Booklog: The Victim

January 22, 2007

The Victim
Saul Bellow
Read: 1.14.07
Rating: Very Good

Later in life, Saul Bellow didn’t think much of his two earlier novels, Dangling Man (1944) and The Victim (1947). He choose to see them as “practice” for his break-through novel, the one he truly wanted to write: The Adventures of Augie March. In a magnificent New Yorker piece written by Philip Roth shortly after his death, Bellow is quoted as saying:

I certainly was transformed [by writing “Augie March”] and I’ll probably be the last to understand how this happened, but I am very willing to look for the cause. I had written two very correct books [“Dangling Man” and “The Victim”] and I shall try to explain what I mean by correct: I seem to have felt that I, as the child of Russian Jews, must establish my authority, my credentials, my fitness to write books in English. Somewhere in my Jewish and immigrant blood there were conspicuous traces of a doubt as to whether I had the right to practice the writer’s trade.

Bellow’s struggle with his Jewishness and his doubts is evident in The Victim, which is a novel of doubt, self-evasion, and the perils of over-consciousness. It is also a short, marvelous, “correct” piece of fiction. The majority of this booklog will be spent explaining what I mean by “over-consciousness,” which is the weakness of Asa Leventhal, the novel’s Jewish protagonist. We’ll return to Bellow’s career trajectory at the end.

Early in the second chapter, Asa Leventhal attempts to describe his deep abiding feeling that he has “gotten away with” bad decisions made early in his life:

He meant that his bad start, his mistakes, the things that might have wrecked him, had somehow combined to establish him. He had almost fallen in with that part of humanity of which he was frequently mindful (he never forgot the hotel on lower Broadway), the part that did not get away with it — the lost, the outcast, the overcome, the effaced, the ruined.

Many “self-made” men would look back on their past mistakes with pride, glad that they managed to rise above a bad start to a position of relative security. But Leventhal instead attributes this to “luck,” and is ever-aware of the tenuousness of his position and the troubles of those who were not so fortunate.

When Kirby Albee, an acquaintance who Leventhal has not seen in years, re-enters his life, this awareness comes to the forefront of Leventahl’s consciousness. Albee, one of the “overcome, feels that he has been wronged, and wants to blame Leventhal for his destitution. Many years ago, Albee recommended Leventhal for a position, and Leventhal’s interview with the boss went very poorly, as Leventhal thought he was being offended and ended his visit in a shouting match. Shortly thereafter, Albee was fired — and he thinks this was Leventhal’s fault, even insinuating that it was done purposefully to pay-back a drunken anti-Semitic slur Albee had made at a party one night. The fact that Albee’s wife left him and then died in a car accident shortly after his termination, and that both his termination and his wife’s desertion were likely a result of his being an alcoholic, complicate matters.

Leventhal is deeply unsettled by Albee and the confrontations the wronged man forces him into. Even though his reasonable assessment of the situation tells Leventhal that the fault is entirely Albee’s, he cannot brush him off, despite his attempts to rationalize. Bellow’s depiction of the relationship between Albee and Leventhal is masterful. Albee is a complete mess, and in his talks with Leventhal he shifts between insinuations, demands, and philosophic considerations about the fragility of life; Leventhal’s reactions oscillate between fury, pity, and confusion — he cannot shake the sense that he truly does owe Albee something.

Leventhal’s thoughts run in all directions, switching directions with rapid speed. The novel is full of passages were he arrives at an opinion or interpretation, then considers the opposite point of view in the next sentence or paragraph. He feels that he is unable to manage his thoughts, emotions, and actions. He considers this a serious “weakness,” and often resolves to cut it out — only to switch gears immediately, or fail miserably when acting on impulses he considers to be strong. Leventhal is caught between thoughts, and his over-consciousness leaves him unable to take control of his life: he is “carried on currents, this way and that. The currents had taken a new twist, and he was being hurried, hurried.”

The driving internal conflict in The Victim is Leventhal’s search for a “limit,” a kernel of truth or an epiphany, that will put a stop to this over-consciousness:

You couldn’t find a place in your feelings for everything, or give at every touch like a swinging door, the same for everyone, with people going in and out as they pleased. On the other hand, if you shut yourself up, not wanting to be bothered, then you were like a bear in a winter hole, or like a mirror wrapped in a piece of flannel. And like such a mirror you were in less danger of being broken, but you didn’t flash, either. But you had to flash. That was the peculiar thing. Everyone wanted to be what he was to the limit.

As Leventhal understands, the solution to the problem of over-consciousness is not to shut out thoughts and feelings, but to find a “limit.”

The “limit” in this case is analogous to the “truth” — for once the truth is discovered or realized, thoughts know where to stop. “Truth” for Leventhal isn’t quite a unifying principle or ultimate reality, but a force that corrals consciousness in the right directions and prevents it from running away. In his considerations of the situation with Albee, Leventhal years to know the real, actual truth of the matter so that he knows what to do and how. Unfortunately, for him, as it is often for all of us, discerning the truth is all too difficult. Yet Leventhal persists in his belief that the truth is a simple matter, waiting to be discovered:

Either the truth was simple or we had to accept the fact that we could not know it, and if we could not know it then there was nothing to go by. ‘There’s just so much that we can do. What the use of wearing yourself out for nothing?’ Leventhal said to himself. No, the truth must be something we understand at once, without and introduction or explanation, but so common and familiar that we don’t always realize it’s around us.

In the book’s final chapter, which acts as a sort of epilogue, the situation with Albee has been settled and Leventhal has “lost the feeling that he had, as he used to say, ‘got away with it,’ his guilty relief, and the acompanying sense of infringement.” He also seems to have given up the search for a truth that will limit his consciousness, instead recognizing that the situation with Albee “was a shuffle, all, all accidental and haphazard. And somewhere, besides, there was a wrong emphasis.” This error, this misappropriation of which both he and Albee were guilty of, “rose out of something very mysterious, namely, a conviction or illusion at the start of life, and perhaps even before, a promise had been made.”

The shift from the search for a “limit” and “truth” to a less extravagant “promise” which is inherent in life marks a maturation, both for Asa Leventhal and for Bellow. The closing pages of The Victim set the stage for the triumphalism of Augie March — and mark Bellow’s departure from the two intensely inward-glancing novels of consciousness that he wrote as a young man in the 40s. This does not by any means indicate that The Victim is a flawed novel — just that it best appreciated as a stepping stone that allowed Bellow to wrestle with, and conquer, his feelings of doubt and inferiority, and to begin his first truly great novel with the affirmation: “I am an American, Chicago born.”


Fun with Numbered Lists: Saul Bellow

January 14, 2007

Having just finished The Victim, I’ve now read 11 of Saul Bellow’s 15 works of fiction. I read my first, Herzog, in the summer of 2004, so I’m been going at a pretty good clip. Here’s the list:

  1. Dangling Man (1944)
  2. The Victim (1947)
  3. The Adventures of Augie March (1953)
  4. Seize the Day (1956)
  5. Henderson the Rain King (1959)
  6. Herzog(1964)
  7. Mosby’s Memoirs (1968)
  8. Mr. Sammler’s Planet (1970)
  9. Humboldt’s Gift (1975)
  10. The Dean’s December (1982)
  11. Him with His Foot in His Mouth (1984)
  12. More Die of Heartbreak (1987)
  13. Something to Remember Me By: Three Tales (1991)
  14. The Actual (1997)
  15. Ravelstein (2000)

As you can see, the remaining four were written during the later period of Bellow’s career, after he won the Nobel Prize. I don’t expect the later novels to be as good as the earlier, both because that’s the way it usually goes with writers, and because the later shorter works of fiction I have read were disappointing.

Here’s how I rank them in order of preference:

  1. Herzog
  2. The Adventures of Augie March
  3. Henderson the Rain King
  4. Seize the Day
  5. Mr. Sammler’s Planet
  6. The Victim
  7. Dangling Man
  8. The Actual
  9. Humboldt’s Gift
  10. Something to Remember Me By
  11. Mosby’s Memoirs

The plan is to read More Die of Heartbreak next, although I’m not in a terrible rush, and to finish with Ravelstein. Hopefully the elderly Bellow won’t let me down.


“in all directions without any limit”

January 7, 2007

From chapter 7 of Saul Bellow’s The Victim, in which Asa Leventhal reflects on how easy it is to hate a person without knowing him:

But certain people did call out this feeling. He saw Cohen, let us say, once or twice, and then, when his name was mentioned in company, let fall an uncomplimentary remark about him. Not that this Cohen had ever offended him. But what were all the codes and rules, Leventhal reflected, except an answer to our own nature. Would we have to be told ‘Love!’ if we loved as we breathed? No, obviously. Which was not to say that we didn’t love but had to be assisted whenever the motor started missing. The peculiar thing struck him that everything else in nature was bounded; trees, dogs, and ants didn’t grow beyond a certain size. ‘But we,’ he thought, ‘we go in all directions without limits.’

The Victim, pp. 71-72